Model review

ASUS Vivobook 17X (K3704) review

ASUS Vivobook 17X (K3704) — from 2023, 2.1 kg, performance 30.

ASUS

Technical specifications

Type Laptop
Release year 2023
Screen 17.3" · 1366x768
Processor Intel Core i5 13500H , Intel Core i7 13700H , Intel Core i9 13900H
Max. RAM 16 GB
Weight 2.1 kg
Battery 50 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
30
/100
CPU
60
/100
GPU
4
/100
USComp
37
/100

A twelve-core engine on a sheet with no strengths

The ASUS Vivobook 17X (K3704) is a 2023 general-class seventeen-inch machine: a twelve-core Core i5-13500H with 16GB of memory at $553. The sheet records no above-median strength — the verdict's empty strength field is accurate — and the readings below are honest: the integrated graphics placing at 3.84, eighty-six percent below the class median; the 16GB ceiling at half the norm; mobility at 31, thirty-eight percent below.

The processor the numbers do not show

The empty strength field is the peer comparison's honest verdict: on the measured axes this machine places below its class everywhere. What the sheet cannot hide is the configuration itself — a twelve-core 13500H is a current-generation hybrid engine that outclasses every general-class median CPU of its year, and the machine's real problem is everything wrapped around it: no scored graphics story, a 16GB ceiling, and a seventeen-inch frame whose mobility reading records the desk-first reality. In absolute terms the creative axes state the gap numerically: photo and design measure at 17, the low band. The capability sheet is empty; no game or software claim is made.

The honest value question

At $553 the ticket prices the processor and the diagonal, and the buyer should want both specifically. The same batch seats the Vivobook 16 (X1605) at $650 with top-quartile reliability and a verified green sheet — the ninety-seven-dollar premium there buys the flags and the longevity, while this seat buys the extra cores and the bigger panel unverified. The value verdict — fairly priced — records that neither choice is wrong; they are different questions.

No depreciation anchor

No release-price anchor is recorded; the platform convention runs near thirteen percent per year. On a mid-tier ticket the curve matters less than the axis profile, and the profile's gaps are the diligence list.

Positioning against the aisle

No recorded analogs fall within the comparison band. Within the family the M1605's Vega placing and the X1605's reliability bracket this seat's offer; the seventeen-inch buyer at this ticket accepts the mobility reading as the format's standing cost.

Bottom line

A fairly-priced desk-first machine that spends its budget on processor cores and screen area, with no measured strength anywhere on the sheet. Buy it when the CPU tier and the diagonal are the workload; the flag-verified alternatives at neighboring tickets serve everyone else.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Vague sense of need

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i5 13500H · 16GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i5 13500H · 13th RAM: 16 GB
mainstream tier

Top configuration suits everyday productivity, light photo editing, and esports titles.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 50) ↔ overall performance (median 43.1).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.3).

Vivobook 17X (K3704): verdict

+
Best for: a balanced profile
!
Watch out for: gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks

➡️ Next step

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

Technical reference for ASUS Vivobook 17X (K3704).

Full specifications

Brand
ASUS
Series
VivoBook
Type
Laptop
Release year
2023
Screen size
17.3"
Resolution
1366x768
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
16 GB DDR4
Weight
2.10 kg
Ports
4
Battery
50 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
30
/100
CPU
60
/100
GPU
4
/100
USComp
28
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 30
Portability 23
Light office 80
Gaming 23
Creative 16
Energy efficiency 79
Connectivity 65
Value 41
Color accuracy
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
6%
RAM
200%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
299%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
171%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
598%
GPU
38%
RAM
400%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
109%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
199%
GPU
15%
RAM
267%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
109%
GPU
8%
RAM
133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
199%
GPU
14%
RAM
200%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
109%
GPU
10%
RAM
267%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
133%
GPU
13%
RAM
100%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
109%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
6%
RAM
100%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
109%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
598%
GPU
77%
RAM
800%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
6%
RAM
200%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
133%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
150%
GPU
17%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
171%
GPU
21%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
133%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
150%
GPU
12%
RAM
200%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
239%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
150%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
199%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
272%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
272%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
239%
GPU
12%
RAM
200%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
199%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
272%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
332%
GPU
19%
RAM
267%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
272%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
214%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
214%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
239%
GPU
14%
RAM
267%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
199%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
498%
GPU
38%
RAM
267%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
272%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
239%
GPU
26%
RAM
200%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
214%
GPU
19%
RAM
267%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
199%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
272%
GPU
19%
RAM
267%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
272%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
142%
GPU
16%
RAM
133%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
171%
GPU
10%
RAM
100%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
199%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
171%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
10%
RAM
200%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
187%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
142%
GPU
6%
RAM
100%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
16%
RAM
100%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
10%
RAM
100%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
272%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
199%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
7%
RAM
200%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
187%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
171%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
120%
GPU
8%
RAM
133%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
38%
RAM
400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
332%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
299%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
171%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
332%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
171%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
399%
GPU
38%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
332%
GPU
32%
RAM
200%

Configuration options

Available model options · 11 variants across 6 categories

🔋 Batteries (1)
50 Wh
⚙ Processors (3)
Intel Core i5 13500H Intel Core i7 13700H Intel Core i9 13900H
🖥 Displays (2)
1366 x 768 1920 x 1080
🎮 Graphics (1)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
🔲 Memory (2)
8GB 16GB
💾 Storage (2)
512GB 1024GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.