ASUS Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607) review
ASUS Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607) — from 2025, 1.78 kg, performance 45.
Technical specifications
| Type | Convertible (2-in-1) |
| Release year | 2025 |
| Screen | 16" · 2880x1800 |
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra 5 226V , Intel Core Ultra 7 256V , Intel Core Ultra 7 258V |
| Graphics | Intel Arc 130V |
| Max. RAM | 32 GB |
| Weight | 1.78 kg |
| Battery | 75 Wh |
Performance scores
The big convertible on efficiency silicon
The ASUS Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607) is a 2025 convertible: an Intel Core Ultra 5 226V with Arc 130V graphics and 32GB of memory at $1,275. The sheet reads reliability at 86 — seventy-six percent above the class median, top-quartile — and the processor at 83.94, also top-quartile, as the strengths; the graphics column reads zero, the recorded weak axis with the platform's standing coverage story.
The form premium, honestly priced
A sixteen-inch 360-degree convertible is a form-factor purchase: the hinge and the touch layer are the product, and the sheet supports them with the 226V platform's measured strengths — top-quartile compute and reliability. The Arc 130V zero is the coverage gap this batch has documented three times over: no scoring entry for the current integrated silicon, absence stored as zero, capability sheet empty. The honest product statement is a large pen-and-touch machine with current-generation efficiency compute and years of expected service.
The twelve-seventy-five question
At $1,275 the ticket prices well above the convertible floor — this batch's Celeron-based Go 14 Flip asks $666 — and the difference buys the platform: three generations of silicon, top-quartile reliability, the 32GB ceiling. Against the ARM tablets at the same money the trade is the x86 toolchain's compatibility against their perfect longevity readings. The buyer at this number is choosing a form and a software ecosystem together; the sheet supports the first and cannot answer the second's edge cases.
No depreciation anchor
No release-price anchor is recorded; the platform convention runs near fifteen percent per year. The 2025 platform's curve is young; the reliability figure is the measured argument for the ticket.
Positioning against the aisle
No recorded analogs fall within the comparison band. The honest neighbors are form-factor ones: the cheaper Flip below and the ARM detachables above — this seat is the x86 middle path with the strongest measured compute among them.
Bottom line
A fairly-priced large convertible carrying current efficiency silicon, top-quartile compute and longevity, with an honestly-unread graphics column. Buy it for the form and the platform; treat the zero as a coverage note and verify visual workloads at the source.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Vague sense of need
Browse category overviews to narrow things down.
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration handles modern AAA games at high settings, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 49) ↔ price (median 355.7).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 68) ↔ overall performance (median 37.4).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.7).
Vivobook 16 Flip (TP3607): verdict
➡️ Next step
Browse category overviews to narrow things down.