Model review

ASUS ZenBook S UX393 review

ASUS ZenBook S UX393 — from 2020, 1.35 kg, performance 34.

ASUS ZenBook S UX393

Technical specifications

Type Ultrabook
Release year 2020
Screen 13.9" · 3300x2200
Processor Intel Core i5 1135G7 , Intel Core i7 1165G7
Max. RAM 16 GB
Weight 1.35 kg
Battery 67 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
34
/100
CPU
70
/100
GPU
4
/100
USComp
40
/100

A six-year-old premium chassis selling its CPU, not its era

The ZenBook S UX393 of 2020 asks $650 today, and the data describes a machine split across two eras: its Core i5-1135G7 compute still places at 70 against an ultrabook median of 59.81 — 17 percent above, top quartile — while its overall performance index of 33.66 sits 19.3 percent below the class median and the aggregate score of 40 trails by a similar margin. The flagged weakness is memory: a 16 GB ceiling at half the class median, in the budget segment for the class. Six years in, the premium chassis is the body and the 1135G7 is the still-beating heart.

The CPU carries the ticket

Top-quartile compute on a six-year-old ultrabook is the machine's one verified strength, and it is a real one: the 1135G7 was an efficiency-tier Tiger Lake part whose single-thread pace still handles office loads, browsing, and media without struggle. Buyers get a processor that outplaces most of its classmates' medians even now. The caveat is equally plain — the performance index that blends everything lands below median, so the CPU advantage does not rescue the whole machine.

The honest ceilings

Memory stops at 16 GB — flagged at half the class median — and the capability sheet is empty, meaning no gaming or software claims survive the data. The overall performance index reads in the low band. The summary the numbers support: this is a writing, browsing, and office machine with a good engine and dated surroundings, not a creative or gaming purchase. The era of the platform, not any single failure, is the constraint.

The gentlest slope in the batch

The measured rate is 8.93 percent per year with no launch anchor — the flattest decay curve among this batch's machines. Six-year-old premium bodies that have already absorbed most of their depreciation tend to plateau. Two more years at this rate retain roughly five-sixths of the ticket, making the residual risk as small as these numbers get.

Positioning on the shelf

No analog peers are returned. The batch's premium-shelf neighbors — the Zenbook S 13 OLED models a year or two younger at $840 to $954 — carry newer efficiency silicon and stronger mobility readings for a couple hundred more. The UX393's case is the price of admission to the premium chassis tier.

Bottom line

For a buyer who wants the premium-ultrabook experience at a mid-tier ticket and whose workload fits 16 GB and an empty capability sheet, the UX393's top-quartile CPU and gentle decay make a quiet case. Anyone needing memory headroom or verified gaming receipts has already scrolled past. The machine is honest about what six years bought and what they cost.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 14 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

memory capacity
16
overall performance
33.7
composite score
40
above median below median class median
  • memory capacity is lower than typical ultrabook class (+50%) (comfort).
    budget segment of category
  • overall performance is lower than typical ultrabook class (+19.3%) (low tier).
    below class average
  • composite score is lower than typical ultrabook class (+18.4%).
    below class average

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i5 1135G7 · 16GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i5 1135G7 · 11th RAM: 16 GB
high tier

Top configuration handles modern AAA games at high settings, video editing, and heavy multitasking.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 51) ↔ price (median 373.2).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 64) ↔ overall performance (median 41.7).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.4).

ZenBook S UX393: verdict

+
Best for: CPU-intensive compute work
!
Watch out for: memory may be limited

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for ASUS ZenBook S UX393.

Full specifications

Brand
ASUS
Series
Zenbook
Type
Ultrabook
Release year
2020
Screen size
13.9"
Resolution
3300x2200
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
16 GB LPDDR4X
Weight
1.35 kg
Ports
6
Thunderbolt
Backlit keyboard
Webcam
TPM (security)
Battery
67 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
34
/100
CPU
70
/100
GPU
4
/100
USComp
30
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 34
Portability 74
Light office 53
Gaming 23
Creative 16
Energy efficiency 80
Connectivity 100
Value 52
Color accuracy
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
6%
RAM
200%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
350%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
200%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
700%
GPU
38%
RAM
400%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
127%
GPU
24%
RAM
200%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
467%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
233%
GPU
15%
RAM
267%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
127%
GPU
8%
RAM
133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
233%
GPU
14%
RAM
200%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
127%
GPU
10%
RAM
267%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
156%
GPU
13%
RAM
100%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
467%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
127%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
100%
GPU
6%
RAM
100%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
127%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
700%
GPU
77%
RAM
800%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
467%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
100%
GPU
6%
RAM
200%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
156%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
175%
GPU
17%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
200%
GPU
21%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
156%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
175%
GPU
12%
RAM
200%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
175%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
233%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
318%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
318%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
12%
RAM
200%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
233%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
318%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
389%
GPU
19%
RAM
267%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
318%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
250%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
250%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
14%
RAM
267%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
233%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
583%
GPU
38%
RAM
267%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
318%
GPU
15%
RAM
200%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
280%
GPU
26%
RAM
200%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
250%
GPU
19%
RAM
267%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
233%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
318%
GPU
19%
RAM
267%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
318%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
167%
GPU
16%
RAM
133%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
200%
GPU
10%
RAM
100%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
233%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
200%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
10%
RAM
200%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
219%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
167%
GPU
6%
RAM
100%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
16%
RAM
100%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
10%
RAM
100%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
318%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
233%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
7%
RAM
200%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
219%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
200%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
140%
GPU
8%
RAM
133%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
467%
GPU
38%
RAM
400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
389%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
350%
GPU
19%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
200%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
389%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
200%
GPU
11%
RAM
200%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
467%
GPU
38%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
389%
GPU
32%
RAM
200%

Configuration options

Available model options · 9 variants across 6 categories

🔋 Batteries (1)
67 Wh
⚙ Processors (2)
Intel Core i5 1135G7 Intel Core i7 1165G7
🎮 Graphics (1)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
• Igpu (1)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
🔲 Memory (2)
8GB 16GB
💾 Storage (2)
512GB 1024GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.