ASUS TUF Gaming F15 (2021) review
ASUS TUF Gaming F15 (2021) — from 2021, 2.3 kg, performance 80.
Technical specifications
| Type | Gaming |
| Release year | 2021 |
| Screen | 15.6" · 1920x1080 |
| Processor | Intel Core i5 11260H , Intel Core i5 11400H , Intel Core i7 11800H , Intel Core i9 11900H |
| Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 4GB , GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 4GB , GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 6GB , GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile 8GB |
| Max. RAM | 64 GB |
| Weight | 2.3 kg |
| Battery | 48 Wh |
Performance scores
The definition of class-average, in the most literal sense
The TUF Gaming F15 of 2021 asks $590 with a Core i5-11260H, an RTX 3050, and 64 GB of RAM — and its data is a statistical curiosity: the peer comparison returns no top strength because the machine's graphics sit at exactly the class median, 78.49 against 78.49, a 0.0 percent delta, and its 64 GB of memory is likewise exactly the class norm. The one flagged weakness is the 48 Wh battery, 32.4 percent below the gaming-class median, in the budget segment. When every axis reads typical, the verdict engine correctly says: this machine is the class, embodied.
Average placement, verified receipts
Typical is not a criticism when the typical is verified. The capability sheet clears Overwatch, GTA V, and Rainbow Six Siege at recommended, with Photoshop and Visual Studio Code clearing minimum — the standard 3050 envelope, green across the board. Compute from the 11260H sits mid-pack H-series for the era. A buyer at $590 gets precisely the class-median gaming machine, receipts included, with the class-standard 64 GB of memory already aboard.
The battery is the one honest asterisk
The 48 Wh cell is the single axis where the machine reads below its class, flagged at roughly a third under the median — the classic budget-TUF trade of a smaller tank in a thick chassis. In practice: plan around outlets. The portability picture is class-typical for a 15-inch gaming body — the absolute portability index reads 31, the low band, unremarkable within the class and unflagged either way.
Steady decay
The measured rate is 13.44 percent per year with no unit anchor for this unit. Two years retain roughly three-quarters of the $590. A class-exact machine at a floor ticket is about as low-risk as depreciation on this shelf gets — there is no premium to lose.
Positioning on the shelf
No analog peers are returned. The batch's same-year Zephyrus M16 at the same $590 offers the 3050 Ti tier and a mobility edge for the same money, while this F15 answers with the exact-median profile and the class-standard memory. The TUF F17 of the same year at $590 trades the diagonal into desk territory.
Bottom line
For a buyer who wants the safest possible $590 gaming purchase — no peaks, no valleys, a verified rec-tier receipt sheet, and the class norm in every column that matters except the battery — this machine is literally the reference point. The 48 Wh cell is the one disclosed compromise. Everything else is the class, delivered as specified.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 3 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
battery capacity is lower than typical gaming class (+32.4%) (standard).
budget segment of category -
graphics performance is in line with typical gaming class (high tier).
above class average -
memory capacity is in line with typical gaming class (professional).
top 25% of its category
🎮 What it can run
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration handles modern AAA games at high settings, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 53) ↔ price (median 749.6).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 29) ↔ overall performance (median 73.9).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).
TUF Gaming F15 (2021): verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.