Dell Pro 16 Plus review
Dell Pro 16 Plus — from 2025, 1.84 kg, performance 46.
Technical specifications
| Type | Laptop |
| Release year | 2025 |
| Screen | 16" · 1920x1200 |
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra 5 226V , Intel Core Ultra 5 236V , Intel Core Ultra 5 238V , Intel Core Ultra 7 266V , Intel Core Ultra 7 268V |
| Graphics | Intel Arc 130V |
| Max. RAM | 32 GB |
| Weight | 1.84 kg |
| Battery | 45 Wh |
Performance scores
Dell Pro 16 Plus (2025): the big efficiency Plus
The Pro 16 Plus at $765 completes the batch's Arc-130V Dell trio — Core Ultra 5 226V, 32GB of memory, a large chassis — and posts a high-tier CPU reading of 84.33, 43 percent above the class median. Reliability at 90 tops the quarter. The graphics line is the platform's standing coverage gap.
Where it holds up
The CPU score of 84.33 is high-tier for the class, and reliability at 90 — 67 percent above the class median, top-quarter — anchors the durability case the Plus line carries. Office capability at 72.91 is high-tier, value at 58.40 mid-tier is the fairest reading in the trio, and the 16-inch frame gives the efficiency platform its thermal comfort zone: long, cool, quiet sessions on document work.
Where it falls short
Graphics performance reads zero — the Arc 130V has no matched entry, a coverage gap rather than a measured zero. The low band holds gaming 19, modeling 17, engineering CAD 22 and photo design 15 — the platform's standing floors in the largest frame. Portability at 41.5 mid-tier is the format's tax. At $765 the machine is a compute-and-durability purchase whose visual side is untested and whose best case ends at the office column.
Price and depreciation
$765 with no anchor recorded; the class curve runs 15 percent per year. Efficiency platforms tend to age into their strengths — endurance matters more as performance norms rise — which softens a brisk rate without rewriting it.
Alternatives to consider
The 16 Plus sibling posts a higher CPU reading at the same price; the 16 Premium at the same $765 answers the untested-GPU question with a measured RTX 5050 and the batch's best sheet. That last comparison is the one to make first.
Bottom line
Fairly priced for the class. Top-quarter reliability and a high-tier CPU in the 16-inch efficiency frame — the untested GPU, floor-level visual axes and mid-tier carry are the recorded costs of the big efficiency frame.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 23 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
graphics performance absent (no data or feature not provided).
-
reliability is higher than typical general laptop class (+66.7%) (high tier).
top 25% of its category -
CPU performance is higher than typical general laptop class (+43%) (high tier).
top 25% of its category
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration handles modern AAA games at high settings, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 50) ↔ overall performance (median 43.1).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.3).
Pro 16 Plus: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.