Model review

HP ProBook 4 G1a 16" review

HP ProBook 4 G1a 16" — from 2025, 1.75 kg, performance 55.

HP

Technical specifications

Type Business
Release year 2025
Screen 16" · 1920x1200
Processor AMD Ryzen 3 210 , AMD Ryzen 5 220 , AMD Ryzen 5 230 , AMD Ryzen 7 250
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 1.75 kg
Battery 48 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
55
/100
CPU
74
/100
GPU
34
/100
USComp
57
/100

HP ProBook 4 G1a 16 (2025) Review: The Same Story, Bigger Screen

The ProBook 4 G1a 16 is the 16-inch sibling of HP's 2025 entry business line: the same Ryzen 3 210 with 32 GB of memory at the same $1,144. The capability sheet is carried over wholesale from the 14-inch model — the panel grows, the carry weakens, and the value proposition stays put.

Where it holds up

The graphics score of 34.39 stands 795.6 percent above the business-class median of 3.84 and feeds a high-band photo design reading of 82, with modeling at 49 and engineering CAD at 47 both mid. Processor performance scores 74.09, 39.9 percent above the class median, reliability reads 83 — up 95.3 percent — and office work holds 84.85 in the high band. The capability checks clear at recommended in Overwatch and Grand Theft Auto V, Far Cry 5 posts a measured 21 fps at minimum, and Photoshop and Visual Studio Code both pass. For spreadsheet-and-documents work on a 16-inch canvas, the fundamentals are all present.

Where it falls short

Memory is the flagged weakness: 32 GB sits 20 percent below the business-class median of 40. Gaming reads 34 in the low band, portability drops to 44.2, mid-band — the cost of the larger chassis — and overall performance at 55.17 and value at 50.4 are both mid, honest numbers for the tier.

Price and depreciation

At $1,144 this matches its 14-inch twin exactly — the panel is effectively free, paid in carry. The modeled depreciation curve runs at 12 percent per year, a moderate pace; no listing anchor is available for dollar projections.

Alternatives to consider

The ProBook 4 G1a 14 (2025) is the identical sheet with portability of 71.3 against 44.2 — the rational carry. The ProBook 4 G1i 16 (2025), same price, adds an RTX 3050: gaming jumps from 34 to 59, engineering CAD from 47 to 72, value from 50.4 to 70.15 — the strongest upgrade in the family. The ProBook 4 G2ah 16 (2026) at $1,300 doubles memory to 64 GB with the same graphics score for $156 more.

Bottom line

Fairly priced for the class. The ProBook 4 G1a 16 delivers the family's high-band photo work and strong reliability on a 16-inch canvas — buy it for the screen, and accept the memory cap and mid-band carry as the terms.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 50 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
34.4
reliability
83
CPU performance
74.1
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance is higher than typical business class (+200%) (light tier).
    top 25% of its category
  • reliability is higher than typical business class (+95.3%) (high tier).
    top 25% of its category
  • CPU performance is higher than typical business class (+39.9%) (high tier).
    top 25% of its category

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: AMD Ryzen 3 210 · 32GB RAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 210 RAM: 32 GB
light tier

Top configuration is sufficient for office work, media playback, and older or undemanding games.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 42.5) ↔ price (median 297.4).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 60) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 62.5) ↔ battery life (median 3.3).

ProBook 4 G1a 16": verdict

+
Best for: everyday graphics and media
!
Watch out for: memory may be limited

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for HP ProBook 4 G1a 16".

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Series
ProBook (other)
Type
Business
Release year
2025
Screen size
16"
Resolution
1920x1200
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
62%
RAM (max)
32 GB DDR5
Weight
1.75 kg
Ports
4
Battery
48 Wh

Performance scores

Performance
55
/100
CPU
74
/100
GPU
34
/100
USComp
57
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 55
Portability 44
Light office 85
Gaming 34
Creative 22
Energy efficiency 87
Connectivity 65
Value 50
Color accuracy 50

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO 240 ✓ Комфортно
Overwatch 240 ✓ Комфортно
GTA V 140 ✓ Комфортно
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Комфортно
Valorant 75 ✓ Комфортно
Counter-Strike 2 73 ✓ Комфортно
Fortnite 40 ⚠ Играбельно
Battlefield 5 30 ⚠ Играбельно
Forza Horizon 4 30 ⚠ Играбельно
Far Cry 5 21 ✗ Низький
Forza Horizon 5 21 ✗ Низький
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18 ✗ Низький
The Witcher 3 18 ✗ Низький
Cyberpunk 2077 14 ✗ Низький
Metro Exodus 14 ✗ Низький
💡 15 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
148%
GPU
50%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
370%
GPU
688%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✓ Runs well
CPU
212%
GPU
115%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
741%
GPU
344%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✓ Runs well
CPU
135%
GPU
215%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
494%
GPU
688%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
138%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
72%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
123%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
86%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✓ Runs well
CPU
165%
GPU
115%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
494%
GPU
688%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
98%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
50%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
135%
GPU
98%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
741%
GPU
688%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
494%
GPU
688%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
53%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
165%
GPU
115%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✓ Runs well
CPU
185%
GPU
156%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
212%
GPU
191%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
98%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✓ Runs well
CPU
185%
GPU
111%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
296%
GPU
688%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✓ Runs well
CPU
185%
GPU
143%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
148%
GPU
84%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
138%
RAM
400%
God of War ✓ Runs well
CPU
337%
GPU
143%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✓ Runs well
CPU
337%
GPU
115%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✓ Runs well
CPU
296%
GPU
111%
RAM
400%
Control ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
115%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✓ Runs well
CPU
337%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✓ Runs well
CPU
412%
GPU
172%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
337%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✓ Runs well
CPU
265%
GPU
138%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✓ Runs well
CPU
265%
GPU
143%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✓ Runs well
CPU
296%
GPU
123%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
617%
GPU
344%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
337%
GPU
138%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
296%
GPU
229%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✓ Runs well
CPU
265%
GPU
172%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
247%
GPU
84%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✓ Runs well
CPU
337%
GPU
172%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✓ Runs well
CPU
337%
GPU
115%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✓ Runs well
CPU
176%
GPU
143%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
212%
GPU
86%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
247%
GPU
84%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
212%
GPU
98%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
148%
GPU
86%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✓ Runs well
CPU
232%
GPU
143%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
53%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✓ Runs well
CPU
148%
GPU
143%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✓ Runs well
CPU
148%
GPU
143%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
148%
GPU
86%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
337%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
148%
GPU
63%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
232%
GPU
84%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✓ Runs well
CPU
212%
GPU
143%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
148%
GPU
75%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
494%
GPU
344%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
412%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✓ Runs well
CPU
370%
GPU
172%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✓ Runs well
CPU
212%
GPU
143%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
412%
GPU
84%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
212%
GPU
98%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
494%
GPU
344%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
412%
GPU
287%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 20 variants across 7 categories

🔋 Batteries (2)
48 Wh 56 Wh
⚙ Processors (4)
AMD Ryzen 3 210 AMD Ryzen 5 220 AMD Ryzen 5 230 AMD Ryzen 7 250
🖥 Displays (5)
1920 x 1200 (300 nits, Non-Touch) 1920 x 1200 (400 nits, Non-Touch) 1920 x 1200 (Touch, 300 nits) 2560 x 1600 (60Hz) 2560 x 1600 (120Hz)
🎮 Graphics (1)
Radeon 740M
• Igpu (1)
Radeon 740M
🔲 Memory (4)
8GB 16GB 24GB 32GB
💾 Storage (3)
256GB 512GB 1024GB

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.