HP 15 review
HP 15 — from 2020, 1.7 kg, performance 47.
Technical specifications
| Type | Ultrabook |
| Release year | 2020 |
| Screen | 15.6" · 1920x1080 |
| Processor | Intel Core i7 1165G7 |
| Max. RAM | 64 GB |
| Weight | 1.7 kg |
Performance scores
HP 15 (2020) — a Tiger Lake i7 ultrabook whose strength is memory, not graphics
A 2020 ultrabook at $483, above the class median of $373. The Core i7-1165G7 and 64GB of RAM make it a high-tier configuration on paper, but graphics scores 0 against the class median and mobility lands at 43 versus a 64 median — below par for a category whose name promises portability.
What 64GB and an i7 buy
Memory is the registered strength — double the class median, top quartile. Teamed with the 4-core i7-1165G7 it handles dense multitasking, large documents, and development-adjacent office work without breaking a sweat. This is a machine for people who keep everything open at once.
Two honest caveats
First, graphics: integrated-only against a class median of 3.84 means no gaming and no GPU-accelerated creative work. Second, mobility at 43 is a full third below the ultrabook median of 64 — the build is heavier and less travel-friendly than the category suggests. High tier on memory, mid-pack on the carry.
Price trajectory
From a $1,400 base, value has decayed at 8.93% per year — one of the gentler curves in this batch — to today's $483, with a projected $401 (−17%) in two years. The premium over the $373 median is real but modest.
Against its neighbors
Both listed analogs undercut it: the Lenovo IdeaPad 3 15ABA7 at $420 and HP's own Laptop 14-ep0199nr at $422. Both are cheaper; neither combines this i7 with 64GB, which is exactly the trade the buyer is being asked to evaluate.
Bottom line
A memory-first ultrabook for the desk-adjacent buyer. The i7/64GB pairing is genuinely rare near $480, but it is not a portable in spirit and has no graphics story — value it as a compact desktop with a screen attached.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 5 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
graphics performance absent (no data or feature not provided).
-
memory capacity is higher than typical ultrabook class (+100%) (professional).
top 25% of its category -
mobility is lower than typical ultrabook class (+32.8%) (mid).
budget segment of category
🔁 Alternatives
Compromise axis: build quality ↔ overall performance
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration handles modern AAA games at high settings, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 51) ↔ price (median 373.2).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 64) ↔ overall performance (median 41.7).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.4).
15: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.