Model review

HP ZBook 17 G2 review

HP ZBook 17 G2 — from 2013, 2.82 kg, performance 15.

HP ZBook 17 G2

Technical specifications

Type Workstation
Release year 2013
Screen 17.3" · 1600x900
Processor Intel Core i5 4200M
Graphics Quadro K1100M 2GB
Max. RAM 16 GB
Weight 2.82 kg

Performance scores

Performance
15
/100
CPU
28
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
22
/100

HP ZBook 17 G2 — a 2013 17-inch workstation whose era has closed

A 2013 17-inch workstation at $228 — less than half the $471 class median, ultra-budget territory. Core i5-4200M, Quadro K1100M with 2GB, 16GB of RAM. The metrics are blunt: graphics 0.17 (−99.6% versus class), reliability 6, mobility 5. No top strength registers.

What the Quadro badge meant — and stopped meaning

In 2013 the K1100M was a legitimate ISV-certified CAD card in a 17-inch chassis, and the machine earned its workstation price (a $2,200 base). Judged today, the same silicon scores 0.17: measured Far Cry 5 and Battlefield 5 both fall far below their minimum bars — the era-scoped honest read is that neither modern gaming nor modern CAD loads register on this hardware at all.

Where that leaves a buyer

The remaining assets are the big panel and the 16GB. As an office-terminal with a 17-inch screen, it functions. As a workstation — the only reason to prefer it over generic laptops — it no longer qualifies by any measured capability.

Price trajectory

From $2,200 to $228 at 7.08% per year — the slow annual rate simply reflects a machine that has already lost 90% of its value. Projected $197 (−14%) ahead. There is no resale expectation left to protect.

Against its neighbors

Pricier: the ThinkPad W541 ($251) and Dell Precision 3510 ($243) — one generation newer, materially more capable. Cheaper: HP's own ZBook 14 G2 ($215) and ZBook 15 ($203). For CAD-on-the-cheap purposes, the extra $15-25 for the Precision 3510 buys a meaningfully newer platform.

Bottom line

A nostalgia machine or a parts donor. Its workstation credentials are historical; at this price the honest alternatives one tier up are cheap enough that even budget CAD buyers should skip this generation.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 50 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
0.2
reliability
6
mobility
5
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance is lower than typical workstation class (+99.6%) (office tier).
    budget segment of category
  • reliability is lower than typical workstation class (+86.2%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category
  • mobility is lower than typical workstation class (+86.1%) (low tier).
    budget segment of category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: mobility ↔ compute power

↑ Pricier and more powerful
↓ Cheaper and less powerful
HP ZBook 14 G2 · $215
HP ZBook 15 · $203

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i5 4200M · Quadro K1100M 2GB · 16GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i5 4200M · 4th GPU: Quadro K1100M 2GB RAM: 16 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 43.5) ↔ price (median 471).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 36) ↔ overall performance (median 60.6).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.4).

ZBook 17 G2: verdict

+
Best for: a balanced profile
!
Watch out for: gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks
$
Price: $228 — a budget-friendly pick

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for HP ZBook 17 G2.

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Series
ZBook (workstation)
Type
Workstation
Release year
2013
Screen size
17.3"
Resolution
1600x900
Panel type
tn
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
16 GB DDR3
Weight
2.82 kg
Ports
7
Thunderbolt
TPM (security)
Optical drive
Battery
68 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
15
/100
CPU
28
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
16
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 15
Portability 6
Light office 33
Gaming 11
Creative 27
Energy efficiency 35
Connectivity 100
Value 27
Color accuracy

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO 240 ✓ Комфортно
Overwatch 240 ✓ Комфортно
GTA V 140 ✓ Комфортно
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Комфортно
F1 2014 55 ⚠ Играбельно
Valorant 40 ⚠ Играбельно
Sims 4 36 ⚠ Играбельно
GRID: Autosport 35 ⚠ Играбельно
Alien: Isolation 25 ✗ Низький
Dota 2 24 ✗ Низький
Dirt Rally 23 ✗ Низький
Battlefield Hardline 17 ✗ Низький
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare 15 ✗ Низький
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor 14 ✗ Низький
Far Cry 4 12 ✗ Низький
Fortnite 12 ✗ Низький
Forza Horizon 4 12 ✗ Низький
Dragon Age: Inquisition 11 ✗ Низький
Evolve 11 ✗ Низький
Watch Dogs 11 ✗ Низький
Assassin's Creed Unity 9 ✗ Низький
Ryse: Son of Rome 9 ✗ Низький
Batman: Arkham Knight 8 ✗ Низький
Battlefield 5 8 ✗ Низький
Counter-Strike 2 8 ✗ Низький
Far Cry 5 7 ✗ Низький
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7 ✗ Низький
The Witcher 3 7 ✗ Низький
Forza Horizon 5 6 ✗ Низький
Cyberpunk 2077 5 ✗ Низький
Metro Exodus 4 ✗ Низький
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3 ✗ Низький
💡 32 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
56%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
139%
GPU
3%
RAM
400%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
79%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
278%
GPU
2%
RAM
400%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
51%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
185%
GPU
3%
RAM
400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
93%
GPU
1%
RAM
267%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
51%
GPU
0%
RAM
133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
93%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
51%
GPU
0%
RAM
267%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
62%
GPU
1%
RAM
100%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
185%
GPU
3%
RAM
400%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
51%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
40%
GPU
0%
RAM
100%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
51%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
278%
GPU
3%
RAM
800%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
185%
GPU
3%
RAM
400%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
40%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
62%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
70%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
79%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
62%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
70%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
111%
GPU
3%
RAM
400%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
70%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
56%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
93%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
111%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
93%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
155%
GPU
1%
RAM
267%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
99%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
99%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
111%
GPU
1%
RAM
267%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
93%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
232%
GPU
2%
RAM
267%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
111%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
99%
GPU
1%
RAM
267%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
93%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
1%
RAM
267%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
66%
GPU
1%
RAM
133%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
79%
GPU
0%
RAM
100%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
93%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
79%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
56%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
87%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
66%
GPU
0%
RAM
100%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
56%
GPU
1%
RAM
100%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
56%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
56%
GPU
0%
RAM
100%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
126%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
93%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
56%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
87%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
79%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
56%
GPU
0%
RAM
133%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
185%
GPU
2%
RAM
400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
155%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
139%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
79%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
155%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
79%
GPU
0%
RAM
200%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
185%
GPU
2%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
155%
GPU
1%
RAM
200%

Configuration options

Available model options · 3 variants across 3 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Core i5 4200M
🎮 Graphics (1)
Quadro K1100M 2GB
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 4400

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.