HP 255 G4 review
HP 255 G4 — 1.96 kg, performance 0.
Technical specifications
| Type | Laptop |
| Screen | 15.6" · 1366x768 |
| Processor | AMD E2-7110 |
| Weight | 1.96 kg |
Performance scores
HP 255 G4 — an E2-7110 at $122: floor-tier with no curve on record
An HP 255 G4 at $122, far below the $248 class median. The AMD E2-7110 APU places this in the entry quad-core tier of its era. The metrics: graphics 0, performance index 0, and an overall USComp score of 3 against a 53 median — near the bottom of the catalog. No top strength registers.
Entry silicon, measured at the floor
The E2-7110 was AMD's cheapest quad-core — four very slow cores for the least expensive shelf. The performance index of 0 states the measurement plainly: the platform falls below every modern baseline. The USComp score of 3 (−94% versus class) places this among the bottom handful of machines in the entire catalog, a position the silicon earned honestly.
Price as sunk cost
No release year or original MSRP is on record for this listing, so no depreciation curve can be computed — treat the $122 as terminal value, fully sunk at purchase. There is no resale expectation and no forward-value question; the only calculation is whether the narrowest duty justifies the money.
The band, one final time
Pricier: the HP 17-p023ng ($137) and Compaq Presario CQ60 ($135). Cheaper: the HP G62 ($113) and Compaq CQ58 ($115). Sideways: the Dell Inspiron 15 3542 ($123) and Lenovo IdeaPad Z575 ($122) — the latter at identical money. The band is uniform early-2010s hardware; nothing in it differentiates on capability.
Where it sits against peers
Perfectly flat against the IdeaPad Z575 at $122 and adjacent to the rest of the floor band — the competitive position has no axis to evaluate beyond price.
Bottom line
The catalog floor: score 3, no curve, no strength, no differentiation. A purchase of last resort for the narrowest single-duty use — any practical buyer should leave this band entirely.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 37 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
graphics performance absent (no data or feature not provided).
-
overall performance is lower than typical general laptop class (+100%) (low tier).
budget segment of category -
composite score is lower than typical general laptop class (+94.3%).
budget segment of category
🔁 Alternatives
Compromise axis: mobility ↔ overall performance
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 54) ↔ price (median 247.9).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 50) ↔ overall performance (median 43.1).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 2.3).
255 G4: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.