Model review

HP 255 G10 review

HP 255 G10 — from 2023, 1.5 kg, performance 42.

HP

Technical specifications

Type Ultrabook
Release year 2023
Screen 15.6" · 1920x1080
Processor AMD Ryzen 3 7330U
Max. RAM 64 GB
Weight 1.5 kg

Performance scores

Performance
42
/100
CPU
58
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
50
/100

A memory-first budget ultrabook from the HP value line

The HP 255 G10 (2023) sits at the practical end of the ultrabook shelf: $349 today against a category median of $373, a typical budget placing for the class. Its listing configuration is unusual in one direction — 64GB of RAM, double the 32GB category median and a top-quartile figure — paired with a Ryzen 3 7330U, a four-core efficiency-focused processor. The memory outclasses the engine: this is a machine built for many open tabs and long battery slogs, not for compute. Its reliability index of 64 sits 25.5% above the class median, a top-25 reading that is genuinely rare at this price.

What 64GB buys — and what it cannot

The RAM ceiling is the headline: 64GB against a 32GB median, a 100% premium over the typical machine here. In practice that means a dozen browser windows, a local model, and a VM can coexist without swapping. But the graphics column tells the other half of the story: no discrete GPU score at all — the best_gpu_score reads 0 against a 3.84 category median — and the capability sheet comes back empty. No game clears even the minimum bars on this configuration. The processor was never meant to drive pixels, and the data agrees.

The honest trade-off: silence on capability, strength in longevity

Where this machine does measure well is durability: reliability 64 versus a 51 median puts it in the top quarter of its class. For a budget business purchase — a study laptop, a field machine, a second computer — that is the metric that matters most. What it gives up is any claim to gaming or GPU-accelerated work; the auto-verdict flags exactly that as the watch-out. Treat it as a writing and browsing tool with unusual memory headroom, and the profile makes sense.

Price trajectory: a steep but completed fall

From a $1,400 launch anchor, the 255 G10 has descended to $349 — a 10.62% annualized loss rate that has already done most of its damage. The two-year projection lands near $279, a further 20.11% drop. In other words, the depreciation curve has flattened: most of the value loss is behind this machine, which is what a budget buyer wants to hear.

Against its neighbors

Cheaper alternatives nearby include the HP 15-dy2795wm at $304.98 and the Dell Inspiron 3593 at $325.62; stepping up in price are the HP Pavilion 14-ec0423no at $377.67 and the HP 14s-fq1034no at $373.22. Within that $305–378 corridor, this listing's differentiator is the 64GB ceiling and the above-median reliability — the rivals compete on brand and screen, not on memory.

Bottom line

The 255 G10 is a longevity-and-memory purchase, not a performance one. For $349 you get top-quartile reliability, double the class memory, and a processor honest enough to make no capability claims at all. Buyers wanting gaming, creative work, or raw speed should look elsewhere; buyers wanting a durable typing machine that will not swap its way through a workday have a rational pick here.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Refining requirements

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

🎯 For your profile

You've viewed: You've recently viewed 5 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.

⭐ What stands out

graphics performance
memory capacity
64
reliability
64
above median below median class median
  • graphics performance absent (no data or feature not provided).
  • memory capacity is higher than typical ultrabook class (+100%) (professional).
    top 25% of its category
  • reliability is higher than typical ultrabook class (+25.5%) (mid).
    top 25% of its category

🔁 Alternatives

Compromise axis: build quality ↔ overall performance

↑ Pricier and more powerful
HP 14s-fq1034no · $373
↓ Cheaper and less powerful
HP 15-dy2795wm · $305

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: AMD Ryzen 3 7330U · 64GB RAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 7330U · Ryzen 7000 RAM: 64 GB
mainstream tier

Top configuration suits everyday productivity, light photo editing, and esports titles.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 51) ↔ price (median 373.2).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 64) ↔ overall performance (median 41.7).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 50) ↔ battery life (median 4.4).

255 G10: verdict

+
Best for: plenty of memory
!
Watch out for: gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks
$
Price: $349 — fairly priced for the class

➡️ Next step

You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.

Technical reference for HP 255 G10.

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Series
HP 240/250/255/350/445 G-series (SMB value)
Type
Ultrabook
Release year
2023
Screen size
15.6"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
ips
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
64 GB DDR4
Weight
1.50 kg
Ports
4
Battery
62 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
42
/100
CPU
58
/100
GPU
0
/100
USComp
33
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 42
Portability 55
Light office 80
Gaming 26
Creative 12
Energy efficiency 82
Connectivity 65
Value 51
Color accuracy
🎮

No FPS data for this model's GPU.

The GPU may be integrated or not yet benchmarked.

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
116%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Grand Theft Auto V ✗ Weak
CPU
289%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
578%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Valorant ✗ Weak
CPU
385%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
193%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
193%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
128%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Dota 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
385%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
83%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
105%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
League of Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
578%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
385%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
83%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
128%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
144%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
128%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
144%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Overwatch ✗ Weak
CPU
231%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
144%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
116%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
193%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
263%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
263%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
231%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
193%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
263%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
321%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
263%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
206%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
206%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
231%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
193%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
482%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
263%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
231%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
206%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
193%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
263%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
263%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
138%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
193%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
116%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
181%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
138%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
116%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
116%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
116%
GPU
0%
RAM
400%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
263%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
193%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
116%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
181%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
116%
GPU
0%
RAM
533%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
385%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
321%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
289%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
321%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
385%
GPU
0%
RAM
999%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
321%
GPU
0%
RAM
800%

Configuration options

Available model options · 2 variants across 2 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
AMD Ryzen 3 7330U
• Igpu (1)
AMD Radeon 660M Graphics

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.