Model review

HP ZBook Studio G4 review

HP ZBook Studio G4 — from 2017, 1.99 kg, performance 39.

HP

Technical specifications

Type Workstation
Release year 2017
Screen 15.6" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i7 7820HQ
Graphics Quadro M1200
Max. RAM 32 GB
Weight 1.99 kg

Performance scores

Performance
39
/100
CPU
49
/100
GPU
18
/100
USComp
43
/100

A thin workstation whose credentials have aged past their prime

The ZBook Studio G4 (2017) was HP's attempt to put workstation-class parts into a slim chassis, and the used market now prices the compromise honestly: $345, about 27% below the workstation median of $471. The Quadro M1200 reads 18.37 on the graphics scale — 56% below the category median of 42.23 — while the 32GB memory ceiling sits 50% under the 64GB norm and the reliability index, at 22 against 43.5, flags a machine well into the back half of its service life. Every headline number points the same direction: this is a budget seat in a premium line's clothing.

What still works, era-scoped

The capability sheet is honest about the boundaries. Grand Theft Auto V and Overwatch clear their minimum bars, but Far Cry 5 fails its minimum by a wide margin — the dividing line between an era this hardware survived and one it did not. Visual Studio Code passes at minimum, so text-first professional work remains comfortable. The Quadro badge once meant certified drivers for professional applications; that era has closed, and what remains is a conventional mid-2010s dGPU with a workstation nameplate.

Three below-median readings, one story

Graphics, memory ceiling and reliability all sit in the budget segment of the workstation class. Read together they describe a machine that was mid-pack at launch and has drifted steadily backward since: modern workstation workloads want more than 18 points of graphics and more than 32GB of headroom, and a 22 reliability score is the data's way of saying the remaining runtime is a purchase of years, not decades.

Depreciation: slow because there is little left to lose

From a $2,200 anchor the price has fallen to $345 at 9.6% per year, with a two-year projection of $282. The curve is gentle less because the machine holds value and more because it is already close to its chassis-and-runtime floor. Buyers here are paying for functional silicon, not for recoverable value.

Against the neighbors

The alternatives bracket it tightly: a Precision 7530 at $385 and a Precision 7720 at $390 above, a Precision 5520 at $321 and a Precision 5510 at $297 below. For $40-45 more, the 7530 and 7720 offer meaningfully newer platforms — the exact premium this listing's below-median graphics makes hard to argue against. The cheaper Dells give up a little performance but keep the budget framing intact.

Bottom line

This is a workstation for a buyer who needs the chassis, the keyboard and a functional dGPU for era-scoped work, at a budget price with budget expectations. The data calls it a budget-friendly pick, which is accurate — the honesty owed to the buyer is that the workstation credentials, not just the price, are what got discounted.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Vague sense of need

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i7 7820HQ · Quadro M1200 · 32GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i7 7820HQ · 7th GPU: Quadro M1200 RAM: 32 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 43.5) ↔ price (median 471).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 36) ↔ overall performance (median 60.6).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.4).

ZBook Studio G4: verdict

+
Best for: a balanced profile
!
Watch out for: gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks
$
Price: $345 — a budget-friendly pick

➡️ Next step

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

Technical reference for HP ZBook Studio G4.

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Series
ZBook (workstation)
Type
Workstation
Release year
2017
Screen size
15.6"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
IPS
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
Graphics
Quadro M1200
RAM (max)
32 GB DDR4
Weight
1.99 kg
Ports
8
Thunderbolt
Battery
68 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
39
/100
CPU
49
/100
GPU
18
/100
USComp
29
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 39
Portability 40
Light office 60
Gaming 30
Creative 35
Energy efficiency 54
Connectivity 100
Value 53
Color accuracy

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO 240 ✓ Комфортно
Overwatch 240 ✓ Комфортно
GTA V 140 ✓ Комфортно
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Комфортно
Valorant 80 ✓ Комфортно
Dota 2 55 ⚠ Играбельно
Fortnite 45 ⚠ Играбельно
Counter-Strike 2 40 ⚠ Играбельно
Doom 37 ⚠ Играбельно
Batman: Arkham Knight 35 ⚠ Играбельно
Battlefield 5 30 ⚠ Играбельно
Forza Horizon 4 30 ⚠ Играбельно
Rise of the Tomb Raider 28 ✗ Низький
The Witcher 3 28 ✗ Низький
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26 ✗ Низький
Far Cry 5 24 ✗ Низький
Forza Horizon 5 21 ✗ Низький
Cyberpunk 2077 16 ✗ Низький
Metro Exodus 14 ✗ Низький
Resident Evil 4 Remake 14 ✗ Низький
💡 20 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
99%
GPU
27%
RAM
400%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
247%
GPU
367%
RAM
800%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
61%
RAM
400%
Minecraft ✓ Runs well
CPU
494%
GPU
184%
RAM
800%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
115%
RAM
400%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
329%
GPU
367%
RAM
800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
73%
RAM
533%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
38%
RAM
267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
66%
RAM
400%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
46%
RAM
533%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
110%
GPU
61%
RAM
200%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
329%
GPU
367%
RAM
800%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
52%
RAM
400%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
71%
GPU
27%
RAM
200%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
90%
GPU
52%
RAM
400%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
494%
GPU
367%
RAM
999%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
329%
GPU
367%
RAM
800%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
71%
GPU
28%
RAM
400%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
110%
GPU
61%
RAM
400%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
124%
GPU
84%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
141%
GPU
102%
RAM
400%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
110%
GPU
52%
RAM
400%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
124%
GPU
59%
RAM
400%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
198%
GPU
367%
RAM
800%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
124%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
99%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
73%
RAM
400%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
225%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
225%
GPU
61%
RAM
400%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
198%
GPU
59%
RAM
400%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
61%
RAM
400%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
225%
GPU
92%
RAM
400%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
274%
GPU
92%
RAM
533%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
225%
GPU
92%
RAM
400%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
73%
RAM
400%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
198%
GPU
66%
RAM
533%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
92%
RAM
400%
Rainbow Six Siege ✓ Runs well
CPU
412%
GPU
184%
RAM
533%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
225%
GPU
73%
RAM
400%
Gears Tactics ✓ Runs well
CPU
198%
GPU
122%
RAM
400%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
176%
GPU
92%
RAM
533%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
225%
GPU
92%
RAM
533%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
225%
GPU
61%
RAM
400%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
118%
GPU
77%
RAM
267%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
46%
RAM
200%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
52%
RAM
400%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
99%
GPU
46%
RAM
400%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
154%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
118%
GPU
28%
RAM
200%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
99%
GPU
77%
RAM
200%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
99%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
99%
GPU
46%
RAM
200%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
225%
GPU
92%
RAM
400%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
165%
GPU
92%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
99%
GPU
33%
RAM
400%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
154%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
99%
GPU
40%
RAM
267%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✓ Runs well
CPU
329%
GPU
184%
RAM
800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
274%
GPU
92%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
247%
GPU
92%
RAM
400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
77%
RAM
400%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
274%
GPU
45%
RAM
400%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
141%
GPU
52%
RAM
400%
Civilization 6 ✓ Runs well
CPU
329%
GPU
184%
RAM
800%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✓ Runs well
CPU
274%
GPU
153%
RAM
400%

Configuration options

Available model options · 3 variants across 3 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Core i7 7820HQ ядра по 2.9 - 3.9 GHz)
🎮 Graphics (1)
Quadro M1200
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 620

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.