Model review

HP EliteBook 8770w review

HP EliteBook 8770w — from 2012, 3.47 kg, performance 20.

HP

Technical specifications

Type Business
Release year 2012
Screen 17.3" · 1920x1080
Processor Intel Core i7 3840QM
Graphics Quadro K3000M 2GB
Max. RAM 16 GB
Weight 3.47 kg

Performance scores

Performance
20
/100
CPU
34
/100
GPU
6
/100
USComp
28
/100

A 2012 mobile workstation kept alive by its price tag

The EliteBook 8770w is a fourteen-year-old flagship: a Quadro K3000M, a third-generation i7, and a 3.47 kg chassis that reads 117% above the business-class weight median. At $289 it trades at roughly the category median, which is the remarkable part — the market still charges median money for 2012 silicon because the chassis and the workstation badge outlived the performance. The data tells the story plainly: mobility at 5, reliability at 7, both in the lowest band. This is a museum seat with a working engine.

What still clears, and what the flags retired

The capability sheet is the era's signature: Grand Theft Auto V and Overwatch clear minimum bars — the GTA figure carries a measured 140 fps receipt — while Far Cry 5 fails its minimum outright. That is the exact boundary of this hardware's world: mid-2010s titles at minimum settings, nothing modern, nothing demanding. The Quadro credentials that once certified professional applications expired with their driver era; what remains is a functional dGPU reading 5.53, which still lands above the 3.84 business-class median — the quiet irony of a category that mostly runs integrated graphics.

The three readings that are the review

Weight 3.47 kg, mobility 5, reliability 7. Together they say: this machine does not travel, and its remaining runtime is purchased, not presumed. A 2012 workstation at $289 is bought for specific reasons — a robust chassis, a good keyboard, legacy ports, an era-correct workflow — and the metrics price all of that honestly. The verdict's own framing, "everyday graphics and media," is generous; the buyer should read it as the top of what the machine can do, not the middle.

Depreciation: the flattest curve in the catalog

From a $1,300 anchor the price has settled at $289, decaying at just 6% per year with a two-year projection of $255. The curve is terminal: the machine is worth its parts and its chassis, and the next decade will remove value in single-digit percentages. Financially this is as close to a sunk-cost purchase as laptops get.

Against the neighbors

The analog table is all business-class machines a decade newer: a Vostro 15 3578 at $309, a ProBook 440 G9 at $317, a ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 6 at $256, a Latitude 5300 at $256. Every one of them outclasses this platform on every modern axis. The 8770w's only argument in that company is the discrete GPU receipt and the tank-grade chassis — a narrow pitch, priced at the median anyway.

Bottom line

Fairly priced for what it is, which is a 2012 workstation kept alive by scarcity of reasons to want it. Buy it for legacy workflows, the chassis or the price-floor dGPU; buy it as a general laptop and every metric in this review will collect.

🧭 Your context

Stage: Vague sense of need

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

🎮 What it can run

⚙️ Configuration analysis

Top configuration: Intel Core i7 3840QM · Quadro K3000M 2GB · 16GB RAM
CPU: Intel Core i7 3840QM · 3rd GPU: Quadro K3000M 2GB RAM: 16 GB
office tier

Top configuration is built for office apps, web browsing, and basic daily tasks.

🤔 How to choose

Universal advice for any use case.

  • Reliability vs price: reliability (median 42.5) ↔ price (median 297.4).
  • Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 60) ↔ overall performance (median 41.5).
  • Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 62.5) ↔ battery life (median 3.3).

EliteBook 8770w: verdict

+
Best for: everyday graphics and media
!
Watch out for: weight is above what is typical for the class
$
Price: $289 — fairly priced for the class

➡️ Next step

Browse category overviews to narrow things down.

Technical reference for HP EliteBook 8770w.

Full specifications

Brand
HP
Series
EliteBook 1xx/2xx (legacy portable)
Type
Business
Release year
2012
Screen size
17.3"
Resolution
1920x1080
Panel type
tn
Color gamut (sRGB)
100%~
RAM (max)
16 GB DDR3
Weight
3.47 kg
Ports
10
Battery
48 Wh~

Performance scores

Performance
20
/100
CPU
34
/100
GPU
6
/100
USComp
20
/100

Performance metrics

Performance 20
Portability 6
Light office 40
Gaming 23
Creative 31
Energy efficiency 41
Connectivity 100
Value 31
Color accuracy

🎮 Gaming performance

FPS @ 1080p for the model's best GPU

Game FPS (1080p) Verdict
CS:GO 240 ✓ Комфортно
Overwatch 240 ✓ Комфортно
GTA V 140 ✓ Комфортно
PUBG: Battlegrounds 140 ✓ Комфортно
Valorant 50 ⚠ Играбельно
Dota 2 35 ⚠ Играбельно
Fortnite 21 ✗ Низький
Forza Horizon 4 18 ✗ Низький
Counter-Strike 2 16 ✗ Низький
Battlefield 5 14 ✗ Низький
The Witcher 3 12 ✗ Низький
Far Cry 5 10 ✗ Низький
Forza Horizon 5 10 ✗ Низький
Cyberpunk 2077 8 ✗ Низький
Metro Exodus 7 ✗ Низький
Resident Evil 4 Remake 5 ✗ Низький
💡 16 games in the database for this GPU. ✓ playable (≥60 FPS), ⚠ medium (30-59), ✗ low (<30).

💻 Software compatibility

Counter-Strike 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
68%
GPU
8%
RAM
200%
Grand Theft Auto V ✓ Runs well
CPU
170%
GPU
111%
RAM
400%
Cyberpunk 2077 ✗ Weak
CPU
97%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Minecraft ✗ Weak
CPU
340%
GPU
55%
RAM
400%
Fortnite ✗ Weak
CPU
62%
GPU
35%
RAM
200%
Valorant ✓ Runs well
CPU
226%
GPU
111%
RAM
400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ✗ Weak
CPU
113%
GPU
22%
RAM
267%
Elden Ring ✗ Weak
CPU
62%
GPU
12%
RAM
133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
113%
GPU
20%
RAM
200%
Apex Legends ✗ Weak
CPU
62%
GPU
14%
RAM
267%
Hogwarts Legacy ✗ Weak
CPU
75%
GPU
18%
RAM
100%
Dota 2 ✓ Runs well
CPU
226%
GPU
111%
RAM
400%
Baldur's Gate 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
62%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Starfield ✗ Weak
CPU
49%
GPU
8%
RAM
100%
Call of Duty: Warzone ✗ Weak
CPU
62%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
League of Legends ✓ Runs well
CPU
340%
GPU
111%
RAM
800%
Sims 4 ✓ Runs well
CPU
226%
GPU
111%
RAM
400%
Helldivers 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
49%
GPU
9%
RAM
200%
Battlefield 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
75%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Far Cry 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
25%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
97%
GPU
31%
RAM
200%
Forza Horizon 5 ✗ Weak
CPU
75%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Metro Exodus ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Overwatch ✓ Runs well
CPU
136%
GPU
111%
RAM
400%
PUBG: Battlegrounds ✗ Weak
CPU
85%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil 4 Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
68%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Escape from Tarkov ✗ Weak
CPU
113%
GPU
22%
RAM
200%
God of War ✗ Weak
CPU
154%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
Horizon Zero Dawn ✗ Weak
CPU
154%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Death Stranding ✗ Weak
CPU
136%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Control ✗ Weak
CPU
113%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Doom Eternal ✗ Weak
CPU
154%
GPU
28%
RAM
200%
Batman: Arkham Knight ✗ Weak
CPU
189%
GPU
28%
RAM
267%
Hitman 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
154%
GPU
28%
RAM
200%
Flight Simulator 2020 ✗ Weak
CPU
121%
GPU
22%
RAM
200%
Watch Dogs Legion ✗ Weak
CPU
121%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
Borderlands 3 ✗ Weak
CPU
136%
GPU
20%
RAM
267%
Anno 1800 ✗ Weak
CPU
113%
GPU
28%
RAM
200%
Rainbow Six Siege ✗ Weak
CPU
283%
GPU
55%
RAM
267%
The Division 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
154%
GPU
22%
RAM
200%
Gears Tactics ✗ Weak
CPU
136%
GPU
37%
RAM
200%
Hunt Showdown ✗ Weak
CPU
121%
GPU
28%
RAM
267%
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands ✗ Weak
CPU
113%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Mafia Definitive Edition ✗ Weak
CPU
154%
GPU
28%
RAM
267%
Days Gone ✗ Weak
CPU
154%
GPU
18%
RAM
200%
Ghostwire Tokyo ✗ Weak
CPU
81%
GPU
23%
RAM
133%
Returnal ✗ Weak
CPU
97%
GPU
14%
RAM
100%
Dying Light 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
113%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Resident Evil Village ✗ Weak
CPU
97%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
The Callisto Protocol ✗ Weak
CPU
68%
GPU
14%
RAM
200%
Atomic Heart ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
Alan Wake 2 ✗ Weak
CPU
81%
GPU
9%
RAM
100%
Black Myth Wukong ✗ Weak
CPU
68%
GPU
23%
RAM
100%
Ghost of Tsushima ✗ Weak
CPU
68%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
The Last of Us Part 1 ✗ Weak
CPU
68%
GPU
14%
RAM
100%
Diablo 4 ✗ Weak
CPU
154%
GPU
28%
RAM
200%
Spider-Man Miles Morales ✗ Weak
CPU
113%
GPU
28%
RAM
200%
Star Wars Jedi Survivor ✗ Weak
CPU
68%
GPU
10%
RAM
200%
Dead Space Remake ✗ Weak
CPU
106%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Lies of P ✗ Weak
CPU
97%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
Sons of the Forest ✗ Weak
CPU
68%
GPU
12%
RAM
133%
Rise of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
226%
GPU
55%
RAM
400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider ✗ Weak
CPU
189%
GPU
28%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey ✗ Weak
CPU
170%
GPU
28%
RAM
200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla ✗ Weak
CPU
97%
GPU
23%
RAM
200%
F1 24 ✗ Weak
CPU
189%
GPU
13%
RAM
200%
Need for Speed Heat ✗ Weak
CPU
97%
GPU
16%
RAM
200%
Civilization 6 ✗ Weak
CPU
226%
GPU
55%
RAM
400%
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order ✗ Weak
CPU
189%
GPU
46%
RAM
200%

Configuration options

Available model options · 3 variants across 3 categories

⚙ Processors (1)
Intel Core i7 3840QM
🎮 Graphics (1)
Quadro K3000M 2GB
• Igpu (1)
Intel HD Graphics 4000

Similar models

Explore alternatives across different angles.