HP Victus 16-s0077NR review
HP Victus 16-s0077NR — from 2023, 2.3 kg, performance 87.
Technical specifications
| Type | Gaming |
| Release year | 2023 |
| Screen | 16.1" · 1920x1080 |
| Processor | Intel Core i5 13500HX , Intel Core i7 13700H , Intel Core i7 13700HX , AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS , AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| Graphics | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6GB , GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile 8GB , GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile 8GB , GeForce RTX 4050 6GB |
| Max. RAM | 64 GB |
| Weight | 2.3 kg |
Performance scores
The rational seat of the sibling pair: identical silicon, $289 under its twin
The Victus 16-s0077NR (2023) is the same machine as the Victus 16-s0076nr — i5-13500HX, RTX 4050 6GB, 64GB of RAM — at $894 instead of $1,183. Every measured axis is identical: CPU at 86.46 against a 65.01 median (enthusiast, top quartile), reliability at 73 against 53 (top quartile), mobility at 38 against 29 (top quartile-adjacent). The peer verdict returns no weakness. In a catalog full of near-duplicates, this is the rare case where the arbitrage is exact: the same platform, the same receipts, and a $289 gap that is the entire difference between the two reviews.
The full receipt sheet, at the better price
Overwatch, Grand Theft Auto V and Rainbow Six Siege clear their recommended bars; Adobe Premiere Pro and Photoshop pass at minimum; Visual Studio Code clears at recommended. The 13500HX compute platform is the strongest axis — enthusiast tier — and the 4050 6GB is its honest mainstream partner for 1080p-high gaming. Reliability at 73 supplies the longevity odds that most tickets in this bracket lack, and mobility at 38 lifts the carry above the class norm.
No measured weakness, one standing fact
The null weakness verdict is a peer-delta reading: nothing in the measured set falls behind the class. The absolute context remains: portability sits in the low band (27), the standing tax of a sixteen-inch gaming chassis, and the 4050 tier is the mainstream middle of the class rather than its top. What the listing adds is pricing: at $894 the platform sits at the same price as a reliability-led OMEN 16z, making the choice among the three top-quartile machines in this band a matter of chassis preference.
Depreciation: 2023 pace on a smaller base
From the $1,800 anchor the price has decayed to $894 at 16.3% per year, projecting to about $627 in two years — a further 30%. The percentage pace matches the twin; the absolute exposure is $289 smaller, which is the same arbitrage expressing itself a second way.
Against the neighbors
A Victus 16-s0076nr at $1,183 is the twin above; an OMEN 16-wd0013dx at $971 and a LOQ 15IRH8 at $972 sit between the pair. The data's honest summary of the bracket: every alternative costs more than this seat, and the only identical one costs $289 more.
Bottom line
Fairly priced, fully receipted, top-quartile on reliability and compute, no measured weakness — and the cheapest ticket to this exact platform. The twin's higher price has no data-side justification; this listing is the rational pick of the pair and one of the strongest value seats in the premium-mid band.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Vague sense of need
Browse category overviews to narrow things down.
🎮 What it can run
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration easily handles AAA games at ultra settings, 4K video editing, and engineering applications.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 53) ↔ price (median 749.6).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 29) ↔ overall performance (median 73.9).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).
Victus 16-s0077NR: verdict
➡️ Next step
Browse category overviews to narrow things down.