HP OMEN 16-wd0013dx review
HP OMEN 16-wd0013dx — from 2023, 2.3 kg, performance 74.
Technical specifications
| Type | Gaming |
| Release year | 2023 |
| Screen | 16.1" · 1920x1080 |
| Processor | Intel Core i5 12500H , Intel Core i7 12700H , Intel Core i9 12900H , Intel Core i5 13420H |
| Graphics | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 4GB , GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 4GB , GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 6GB , GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile 8GB , GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 8GB , GeForce RTX 4050 6GB |
| Max. RAM | 64 GB |
| Weight | 2.3 kg |
Performance scores
The definition of class-average — in the useful sense
The HP OMEN 16-wd0013dx (2023) is the rare listing where the measurement engine finds nothing to say in either direction: no top strength, no top weakness, both scans returning empty. The graphics score of 78.49 equals the gaming-class median to the decimal; the 64GB RAM ceiling equals the class median; weight and placing are typical. At $971 against a $749.56 median it prices above typical — and what it prices is precisely averageness, delivered in a current chassis.
Median on the GPU, green on the sheet
The RTX 3050 configuration lands exactly at the class median — the shelf's true center of gravity. The capability sheet converts that into recommended-level greens on Overwatch, Grand Theft Auto V, and Rainbow Six Siege, with Adobe Photoshop and Visual Studio Code passing at minimum. This is the machine the class median is measured around: recommended-tier 1080p gaming, comfortable creative minimums, twelve cores of current CPU underneath.
What no-weakness and no-strength actually mean
Both null readings are honest peer-comparison data, not missing data: against its own class the machine neither stands out nor falls behind. The absolute levels complete the picture — portability sits in the low band (27), the standing tax of a 16-inch gaming chassis, while photo & design (96) and light-office capability (94) read at the top of the scale. The caveat writes itself — the buyer pays 29.5% above the class median for a machine that measures exactly like the class. What the premium buys is the 2023 chassis year and the specific configuration, not outperformance. Buyers wanting an edge — in GPU, in portability, in value — must pick a different seat; this one is the reference point they deviate from.
Depreciation: the new-silicon pace
From a $1,800 anchor to $971 is a 16.26% annualized decline, projecting to $681 in two years — a further 29.87%. That is the standard pace for recent gaming hardware; nothing unusual in either direction. The exposure over a two-year hold is roughly $290.
Against its neighbors
Below it: the Dell G15 5520 at $870.04 and the Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H at $882.09. Above it, in-family: the OMEN 16-wd0353ng at $1,047.16 — the same 12500H-plus-3050 pairing for $76 more — and the OMEN 17-ck1020nr at $1,086.93. The corridor prices small steps in GPU and size around this center seat.
Bottom line
Fairly priced for buyers who want the class's exact center: median GPU with recommended greens, median memory, no low-band axis, no premium readings. The twin listing at $1,047.16 charges more for identical silicon, which makes this the better of the two average seats. Choose it when average is the goal; skip it when it is not.
🧭 Your context
Stage: Refining requirements
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.
🎯 For your profile
You've viewed: You've recently viewed 50 models — compare this model with them in the analogs matrix.
⭐ What stands out
-
price is higher than typical gaming class (+29.5%) (mid).
above class average -
graphics performance is in line with typical gaming class (high tier).
above class average -
memory capacity is in line with typical gaming class (professional).
top 25% of its category
🔁 Alternatives
Compromise axis: mobility ↔ overall performance
🎮 What it can run
⚙️ Configuration analysis
Top configuration handles modern AAA games at high settings, video editing, and heavy multitasking.
🤔 How to choose
Universal advice for any use case.
- Reliability vs price: reliability (median 53) ↔ price (median 749.6).
- Weight vs CPU: mobility (median 29) ↔ overall performance (median 73.9).
- Upgradeability vs battery: upgradability (median 100) ↔ battery life (median 2.5).
OMEN 16-wd0013dx: verdict
➡️ Next step
You're refining — compare finalists head-to-head.